Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:35:10 UTC
C.3.3:8.2 - Review playbook (10 minutes)
Identity checked first? Same kind reused without a bridge, or two distinct kinds and the obtaining correspondence shown? Add Scope or F.9 relations only when the receiving use consumes them.
Order claims honest? Any ⊑ inversions? Collapses disclosed?
CL^k plausible? Based on preserved properties, not name similarity?
Loss notes present? Will they force narrowing of Scope or extra tests?
Definedness area clear? Guard will fail closed outside it?