C.3.4:8 - Interactions
C.3.4:8.1 - With Kinds and Subkinds
Use an adaptation declaration for procedural tailoring. If the criterion becomes conceptual and stable, identify another local kind and establish the exact obtaining U.SubkindOf relation. Repeated declaration use, promotion language, and a catalog link do not establish that relation.
C.3.4:8.2 - With Judgment and Declarations
- The base
KindSignatureepisteme supplies the kind criterion and its own F. - The separate adaptation declaration supplies additional candidate-feature constraints or vocabulary bindings and may have its own F.
- The exact
KindUseAdaptationJudgmentpins both editions and preservesunknown; neither formality value belongs to the kind, candidate, or truth value. - An optional extension-like result remains only a pinned-edition representation of true adaptation judgments.
C.3.4:8.3 - With KindBridge
A locality change first prompts kind-identity comparison. When the same base kind continues, select the receiving signature and adaptation declaration and evaluate a fresh candidate result without a KindBridge. When two independently identified kinds are distinct and an exact directional correspondence is relied on, establish the C.3.3 KindBridge, its assertion, the receiving declaration, and any needed adaptation-correspondence declaration. Only justified bridge penalties affect R; F, G, admissibility, and classification truth remain unchanged.
C.3.4:8.4 - With Guards
Guard_KindUseAdaptation designates exact adaptation and base-signature editions, checks admissibility, evaluates an admissible candidate, checks Scope separately, and keeps not-applicable, unknown, and refusal distinct. For distinct-kind cross-local use, it composes with the C.3.3 guard only after the bridge and receiving declarations are recoverable. For same-kind reuse, it performs the fresh receiving evaluation without inventing a bridge.