C.3.5:5 - Misuse and antidotes (informative)

• “Higher KindAT means wider G.” Wrong: only the scope governor changes G.
• “Gate on KindAT.” Wrong: use the exact classification, scope, evidence, and policy predicates required by the receiving guard.
• “Depth in U.SubkindOf determines KindAT.” Wrong: the facet concerns intentional stance, not graph depth.
• “KindAT belongs on the claim or signature.” Wrong: the tag is on the local kind; a catalog may represent that assignment.
• “A reused kind-use adaptation declaration has been promoted automatically.” Wrong: if the distinction is conceptual and stable, separately identify a local kind and establish any obtaining U.SubkindOf relation under C.3.1.
• “KindAT rates quality.” Wrong: formality belongs to the relevant episteme; assurance concerns an exact target claim and a named receiving use under B.3.