fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 52513–52520

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 10:39:28 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:40:04 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 11:30:17 UTC

C.3.5:7.2 - Review questions

  1. Is the tagged object the exact local kind rather than its signature, card, candidate, claim, or extension?
  2. Does the anchor describe the kind’s intentional stance rather than the current number of candidates?
  3. Are proposed F and R changes stated as planning decisions over their actual owners rather than effects of KindAT?
  4. Does a stable distinction expressed in an adaptation declaration require a separately identified kind and independently obtaining subkind relation?
  5. When cross-context use relies on a KindBridge, does it recover the exact occurrence and separate bridge assertion instead of inferring congruence from the tag?