Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 10:39:28 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:40:04 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 11:05:10 UTC

C.3.A:A.3 - Regulatory guards

Guard_RegAdopt(P, candidate, authorityKind, authoritySignatureEdition, localKind, localSignatureEdition, S_local).

  1. Check P’s governed scope and explicit time against S_local.
  2. Recover the exact authority/local declarations and establish their declaration-level compatibility under §4.1; recover the KindBridge relation and bridge assertion when the use requires a correspondence between distinct kinds.
  3. For any required bridge, check applicability and route its consequence to R.
  4. Evaluate J(candidate, localKind, localSignatureEdition, S_local).
  5. Continue only on true; retain known false or unknown before refusing.
  6. Check freshness of relied-on regulatory and candidate support separately.

Guard_RegChange(change, impactedDeclarations, impactedScopes).

  1. Decide whether the change alters criterion, reference scheme, applicability, or more than one.
  2. Author the required declaration episteme, check its signature qualification and any edition relation under C.3.2:5, and let C.3.1 settle kind continuity.
  3. Update Scope independently when jurisdiction/version/time coverage changes.
  4. Reassess whether the receiving use now requires a correspondence between distinct kinds, and, when it does, the obtaining KindBridge relation and its assertion’s mapping, loss, CL^k, evidence, and admitted use.
  5. Evaluate affected exact candidates for the new receiving use under the new declaration edition while preserving every prior judgment indexed to its prior edition and slice; do not edit a set representation or rewrite historical judgments as a substitute.

Guard_RegXContextUse(P, candidate, sourceKind, targetKind, targetSignatureEdition, S_target). Apply Guard_XContext_Typed and then the exact target candidate judgment. A missing target dependency yields unknown; it is not cured by a high bridge assessment.