C.30.AD:2 - Problem

How can FPF keep architecture descriptions adequate without:

• treating a description, model, view, diagram, graph, card, table, dashboard, file, publication occurrence, publication form, carrier, or rendering as the architecture, an obtaining relation, or a selected structure;
• treating all architecture documentation as one generic description with no exact EntityOfConcern or selected-structure recovery;
• granting U.View membership because an episteme was authored, constructed, queried, selected, bundled, diagrammed, or published;
• losing the link between one exact viewpoint episteme, the five-part conformance predicate, and the architecture structure kind being described;
• letting one attractive view hide lost structure, stale source, or missing correspondence;
• letting publication quality become empirical grounding, evidence sufficiency, assurance, gate passage, decision claim, work completion, or release authorization;
• making ordinary architecture triage too heavy for a first useful architecture move.