Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:30:10 UTC

C.30.LCA:7 - Conformance Checklist

IDCheckWhy it matters
CC-LCA-1A conforming full description or view has one C.2.1 identity whose EntityOfConcern is one exact selected control structure; the described and controlled holons and any actual ArchitectureRelation remain separately recoverable.Prevents a free-floating diagram, claim, or unspecified relation set from becoming structure or episteme identity.
CC-LCA-2A conforming use records the direct control relations and participant meanings present: for example, reference provision, regulation or control, observation or estimation, plant or controlled-holon participation, or supervision. Systems, classifications, assignments, Methods, Work, and F.6 attribution are separate optional facts.Keeps the view tied to actual control relations and their participants.
CC-LCA-3Layer, level, tier, or stack wording enters only with a recovered direct control relation, inter-layer relation, rate band, or B.2.5 supervisor-subholon relation. An assignment alone is insufficient.Prevents generic stratification wording from standing in for control structure.
CC-LCA-4A claimed U.View names the exact viewpoint episteme and independently obtaining EpistemeViewpointConformanceRelation; bundle membership, viewpoint label, authoring, query, diagram, and publication are insufficient.Keeps structural description and view membership distinct.
CC-LCA-5Use the relevant patterns to state or test stability, safety, dynamics, temporal-aspect or rate-band structure, authored temporal-claim adequacy, causal use, empirical grounding, evidence, gate, and assurance claims.Prevents LCA-as-proof.
CC-LCA-6Use B.2.5 to state or test its compound feedback claim; keep that assertion separate from the base relation references.Keeps the assertion, base relations and stronger stability, safety, evidence, gate and assurance claims distinct.
CC-LCA-7Use E.18 to identify and test any transformation-flow path slice used by the control view. The slice is not the control structure or actual transformation itself.Keeps transformation-flow and LCA relations distinct.
CC-LCA-8Use C.29 for the mathematical-lens portion of cross-domain transfer, prediction, reusable explanation, or assurance input when that lens changes the use.Preserves mathematical-lens use and representation boundaries.
CC-LCA-9The record states admissible use, non-admissible use, and a source-return condition when the intended use relies on hidden source-side distinctions; representation, E.24.PUB publication occurrence, publication form, and carrier remain separate.Prevents narrowed recognition or publication from becoming unchecked reliance.