C.30.STRAT:4.5a - Filled repair note

For The cache proves the architecture scales, do not hide the split inside one formal record. Read it as three candidate claims:

1. cache may name a state-bearing module, interface arrangement, flow buffer, or ordinary source label; the sentence does not yet decide which;
2. proves requires an actual evidence relation or assurance argument; otherwise lower that wording;
3. scales requires a characteristic and bearer, comparison or scale construction, architecture scale-preference claim, or mathematical-lens use.

A retained note can remain compact:

StratificationSourceLabelRepairNote:
  sourceLabel: cache
  boundedTextSpan: “The cache proves the architecture scales.”
  recoveredObjectRelationOrClaim: cache meaning unresolved; proof and scale are separate claims
  sourceUseDisposition: keep cache as a source label until its relation or bearer is known
  patternRef?: A.6.M, A.6.F, E.18, A.19.SPR, or A.3.3 for the cache;
    C.16.P, C.29, or C.31.ASAP for scale; A.10, B.3, or G.6 for proof or assurance
  repairedWordingOrDemotion: “Identify what ‘cache’ names here, which scaling claim is being made, and what evidence supports it.”
  admissibleUse: start the three-way investigation
  stopOrReturnCondition: return to the source for the missing cache meaning, scaling basis, or evidence; use the direct pattern once that branch is recovered
  blockedOverread?: the source's proof-and-scale claim remains unsupported while its cache subject, scaling basis, and evidence are unresolved
  remainingReaderUse: state the smallest result for each recovered claim, or keep ordinary source wording
  disposition: reduced-use-cue; direct-pattern-use only for branches that become current

The note preserves every live branch without requiring a project engineer to reproduce E.10.ARCH authoring coordinates.