| Everyday architecture speech vs FPF kind precision | Engineers need familiar phrases such as functional architecture, physical architecture, and control architecture; a precise FPF use recovers the described holon, selected structure, structure kind, architecture concern, admissible-use frame, and the exact use of inspected material as source, description, view, or publication form. |
| Direct architecture relation vs claim vs description | An obtaining ArchitectureRelation, a C.2.1 claim about it or about candidate or expected structure, and a useful architecture description are easy to collapse into one word even though only the direct relation is subject-side architecture. |
| Multi-view adequacy vs module reduction | Architecture includes functional, flow, control, module structure, interface relation, Work, system-role-kind or assignment structure, evidence relation, information structure, placement structure, scale, and declared logical structures; module structure and interface relations form only one structure family. |
| Small first architecture move vs full record | The practitioner often needs one architecture question card, not a complete architecture description record set. |
| Multi-view architecture discipline vs tool lock-in | Current FPF separates holons, selected structures, descriptions, viewpoints, views, correspondences, publications, source return, and the patterns used for separate claims without importing a tool-specific lifecycle. |
| Structure source relation vs overread | A structure, graph, lens, measurement, or model can supply a source relation for an architecture description without proving evidence, assurance, causality, gate passage, or release. |