C.31.RSA:5.1 - Worked case: reusable evidence package, bespoke delivery work
Situation:
A regulated product line has reusable component templates and a reusable test package.
Each customer delivery still repeats approval work and bespoke integration exceptions.
ReusableStructureTriage:
describedHolonRef: product-line delivery system
reuseQuestion: which selected structures are reused and where does bespoke residue grow?
deploymentBoundary: regulated customer deployments
intendedAccountingUse: decide the next reusable-structure repair
claimScopeRef: reusable-structure accounting for regulated delivery
qualificationWindowRef: 2026Q3 regulated-delivery review window
architectureClaimRef: C.30 architecture claim for the product-line delivery system and its selected delivery structures
structureRefs:
component template structure
interface grammar structure
evidence package structure
delivery work structure
accountingRelationRefs:
reuse, exception, and bespoke-residue relations for the named deployments
evidenceRefs:
deployment, approval, integration-exception, and reusable-test-package records
whereReusableStructureCurrentlyLives:
component template structure
reusable test package
interface grammar for standard variants
whereBespokeResidueCurrentlyGrows:
customer-specific approval work
integration exceptions outside interface grammar
local evidence witnesses not covered by reusable package
residueRefactoredInto:
workStructure + evidencePackage + interfaceSpecification
residueAcceptedAsBoundedException:
customer-specific regulatory clause with declared non-admissible reuse
sourceReturnCondition:
return to deployment evidence and regulatory exception record before assurance or gate use
relatedClaimPatternsIfClaimed:
`A.10` for the evidence-validity claim's source-to-use basis; `G.6` when a citable provenance path is needed; `B.3` for assurance reliance; `A.6.M` for interface grammar when a module-interface claim is made; `C.16` for the measurement account; `A.19.CPM` for comparison under a declared comparator
stopCondition:
report-only accounting unless comparator admission, evidence validity, and assurance validity are declared
Admissible move: publish the local report-only RSA note and refactor the repeated organization of delivery approval work into reusable work structure and reusable evidence structure. Non-admissible move: claim that the reusable evidence package proves every deployment or that a high reusable share makes the architecture better.