Link to current text
C.32.ACS:9 - Consequences
| Consequence | Benefit | Cost |
| Architecture optimization gets declared criteria. | C.32 and C.32.MLAO can use multi-criteria language without unnamed criteria. | The project must admit and type rows before synthesis or optimization claims. |
| The 300-to-3 problem is handled by staged admission. | Broad catalogues inform the project without serving as the project criteria set. | Some familiar qualities must be guardrails or context rows. |
| Anti-Goodhart guardrails are explicit. | Optimization can protect functional adequacy and other architecture concerns. | A single convenient score cannot govern choice by itself. |
| Measurement and eval stay clean. | C.16 and ACE keep readings, eval programs, and eval results separate from criteria. | Some eval programs require additional receiving-pattern work before they can drive action. |
| Q-Bundle structure stays clean. | Composite quality families keep their C.25 structure. | ACS cannot shortcut a composite family into one scalar row. |