fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 75390–75408

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:00:10 UTC

C.32.ADA:4.2 - Complete coordinate set

Evaluate every coordinate. If a coordinate is not live, mark it notTriggered only with a short reason grounded in the declared use.

CoordinateWhat is evaluatedRepair when weak
BoundedDecisionQuestionRecoverabilityDecision subject, described holon, exact U.ClaimScope, relevant A.2.6 U.ContextSlice membership, effective reference scheme and plane, evaluation window, status, and decision question can be recovered; a selected BoundedModelUseStructure is named only when it independently changes interpretation.Repair the exact missing decision-subject, scope, slice, or model-use-structure assertion using C.32.PAD, A.2.6, or A.1.1.
CandidateBasisAndSelectionTraceabilityCandidate palette, residual frame, comparison, selection, selected set, or reason no candidate-set question is live is recoverable.Repair the missing candidate, comparison, or selection assertion using the exact applicable content in C.32, C.32.MLAO, A.19.CPM, A.19.SelectorMechanism, G.5, or C.11.
AffectedStructureAndDescriptionAdequacyAffected selected structures, views, architecture descriptions, correspondence, structural-information lens uses, and source-return are recoverable.Repair the exact missing structure, description, correspondence, or lens-use assertion using C.30, C.30.ASV, C.30.AD, A.6.F, A.6.M, or C.29.
ArchitectureCharacteristicTradeoffAdequacyArchitecture characteristics, criteria rows, Q-Bundles, eval readings, accepted losses, and guardrails are explicit.Repair the exact missing characteristic, criterion, reading, loss, or guardrail assertion using C.32.ACS, C.32.HCS, C.25, C.32.ACE, C.16, C.31, or C.31.ASAP.
MethodAndWorkDockingAdequacyMethod-use instructions, exact intended or acting Systems, Work boundaries, readiness, and expected structure effects are usable. Intended assignment requirements remain modal; actual assignment and F.6 attribution are required only when the instruction or evaluation expressly consumes precise assignment-bound attribution. Responsibility remains independently governed.Repair the exact missing MethodDescription, Method, A.13 performer basis, A.15.1 Work fact, optional direct assignment species and F.6 attribution, responsibility predicate or missing governor, readiness, or expected-effect assertion using A.15, A.15.1, A.15.2, A.15.5, E.8, E.11.PUR, A.6.RCD, or C.24.
ArchitectDeveloperSplitAdequacyStructures fixed by the decision, refinement left open to developers, holon-transition or BOSC-triggered boundary refs, and source-return condition are explicit.Repair the exact split or claim-kind assertion using C.32.PAD, A.15, or B.2.P; use B.2 only when whole reidentification is triggered.
PublicationProjectionAdequacyADR-like or other publication projection carries the needed section functions for the declared readers.Use C.32.ADR for the exact projection, E.17 for a source-backed publication face and source return, and E.24.PUB for the publication occurrence, form, carrier bearing, audience, and availability.
EvidenceEvalAndGateExitAdequacyEval, evidence, assurance, gate, or institutional-governance assertions are named only when live, with their exact predicates and subject-pattern locators.Repair the exact assertion using C.32.ACE, C.16, A.10, B.3, A.21, or the named institutional-governance content.
EvolutionAndReopenConditionAdequacyReopen, supersession, stronger-source return, and changed-context triggers are clear.Repair the exact reopen, supersession, archive/front, improvement, or source-currentness assertion using C.32.PAD, C.32.FAIL, C.18, C.19, or E.23.
TransformerTransformedCorrespondenceAdequacyRequired correspondence between a separately typed influence-source architecture and the transformed-side architecture is recoverable when the decision depends on it. Keep a modal or unresolved synthesis frame distinct from an exact row about an obtaining influence occurrence under C.32.CONWAY.Use C.32.CONWAY to repair the correspondence frame or exact pair row. Use A.15, A.3.4, A.3.4.P, or E.18 only for a separately current Method/Work, actual-change, or flow-structure claim.
NonOverreadAndSubjectAssertionAdequacyThe decision, description, publication, Method, eval, evidence, assurance, and gate claims remain distinct subject assertions with exact defining or constraining ClaimGraphs.Repair the exact overread, relation, wording, or name using A.7, A.6.P, E.10, F.18, or the subject pattern for the unresolved question.
ConsequenceAndRepairGuidanceAdequacyConsequences, accepted losses, weak coordinates, and next repair instructions are actionable for the declared use.Repair the exact missing consequence, projection function, or coordinate assertion using PAD, ADR, or the coordinate-specific subject pattern.