Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:40:10 UTC

C.32.CONWAY:4.3 - Qualified network reading

The same exact pair row may appear in architectureCorrespondenceRowRefs[] of several TransformationFlowStructureNetworkRecord@Context values while its pair, relation occurrence, evolution window, correspondence use, and claim scope remain current. Each citation contributes only one qualified architecture reading. The row’s optional singular networkCrossFlowRelationRowRef, when present, qualifies only the exact current record edition named by that locator; it does not qualify the row’s citations from other records. No citation makes the pair row the network, adds a member, or satisfies the network’s exact cross-flow-relation discriminator.

Set networkCrossFlowRelationRowRef only when the pair row’s exact influence occurrence and architecture-relation participants are independently grounded in member-flow positions and the locator’s transformationFlowStructureNetworkRecordRef names the same exact current record whose architectureCorrespondenceRowRefs[] citation this mapping is intended to qualify. Resolve that record first, then require exactly one crossFlowRelationRow to match the occurrence and complete ordered endpoint-binding identity. That row must preserve the same kind, governor, participant order, endpoints, and bindings as this correspondence row. Zero or several matches, a different record, or a stale record edition leaves the locator unresolved. Do not reuse one locator to qualify another record’s citation. A record citation alone infers none of those facts.

Acting-system identity, system-role assignment, F.6 attribution, Work, actual transformation, actor-side or Work-to-change relation, influence relation, and network cross-flow relation remain separately governed even when one case cites all of them.