Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 15:41:27 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 15:43:46 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:55:10 UTC

C.32.FAIL:8 - Common repair cues

Anti-patternSymptomRepair
WarningNameOnlyA memorable warning name does not change the next repair action.Add the architecture object, blocked overread, subject pattern, and repair action, or remove the row.
EverythingIsFailureCueAny architecture worry is admitted as a C.32.FAIL cue.Admit only recurring failures that change the first architecture repair action.
AuditPromptAsPatternThe row says to measure, review, or audit.Demote it unless it names the architecture object and repair action first.
EvidenceAsRepairMore evidence is treated as the repair.Name the architecture repair first; evidence may follow under its own pattern.
DecisionInsideRepairCueThe cue says which architecture to choose.Local choice belongs to C.11; project architecture decision belongs to C.32.PAD after the candidate repair is available.
DescriptionCarrierAsRepairA diagram, report, dashboard, or publication face is treated as the repair.Use C.30.AD for description use, E.17 for a source-backed publication face and source return, and E.24.PUB for the publication occurrence and audience availability. Keep dashboard, report, or generated-carrier use under its source-use or publication relation. Keep C.32.FAIL only if an architecture object under stress and repair action are named.
FunctionAsQualityA function such as teach, compute, certify, or regulate is treated as the architecture characteristic.Recover the function under A.6.F and name the separate architecture characteristic or quality bundle.
FunctionalGraphNoBearerA functional graph, workflow, or method structure names a required function that no admitted bearer can perform under the module, placement, resource, control, or evidence constraints declared for the case.Use C.32; add or change bearer, split function, change placement or resource access, change control responsibility, reduce demand, or reject the candidate.
IdealityAsAdequacyShortcutThe phrase ideal architecture, no modules, or fewer parts is used as architecture adequacy by itself.Convert it into a C.32 candidate and name function bearing, lost structure, new burden, architecture characteristics, and pattern for the next question.
UniversalBearerAsAdequacyClaimA universal module, general substrate, or existing resource is used as better architecture because it can carry more functions.Use C.19.1 only when scale advantage is claimed. Otherwise recover module-interface, coupling, evidence, control, safety, admissibility, and source-return effects before stating an explicit comparison under A.19.CPM, local choice under C.11, set-returning selection under A.19.SelectorMechanism, or selected-set result declaration under G.5. For publication, use E.17 for a source-backed face and source return and E.24.PUB for the occurrence and audience availability.
ConwayNameAsRepairA warning row says Conway, mirroring, or inverse Conway but gives no architecture repair.Open C.32.CONWAY; name the changed referent, the exact influence-source-side and transformed-side C.30 architecture relations or modal claims, the direct influence kind/predicate/occurrence or truthful stop, affected characteristics, candidate form, gain, loss, and pattern for the next question. Keep actors, assignments, Work, actual transformation, and any E.18.NET network or cross-flow occurrence with their subject patterns.