C.32.MWA.PP:7 - Conformance Checklist

Use these questions on the arrangement being constructed; they do not require a separate record for every local action.

Recognition and construction

• The result names an obtaining or possible-future practice, receiving result and decision boundary; a supplied typical network is distinct from proposed local bindings and actual performance.
• Each Method and candidate account keeps its prior status. A missing subject Method or join is an exact return, not a role or office label.
• A consequential result can be followed through its subject, applicable Method, intended Work, capable performer, means, authority and receiving condition.
• Each selected structure can change the decision. Method composition or unfolding, Work parthood, overlap and first–then guards, allocation, support, description and cultural relations retain their meanings.
• Serious alternatives differ in direct relations, not view or format; they retain the feasible incumbent and applicable ordinary-workplace, common, specialized, federated, external or AI-based provision without requiring a new office.
• The comparison exposes the interaction or moved burden that can reverse the choice, including qualified shared resources, recurring work, windows, continuing obligations and the transition.
• Commitments distinguish who can assess, assign, authorize, supply and accept. Agreements or changed authority remain conditional until effective.
• A sufficient current arrangement or realization is preserved. Additional implementation or trial has a worthwhile contribution, feasible conditions, observations, stop and recovery.
• The realization receives the exact remaining contribution and return condition; it distinguishes a supplied result, Method enactment, supported capability and unpromised rescue.
• A change to a Method, means, provider, demand or authority reaches affected receiving uses without erasing valid independent work or performed history.

Assurance at the claimed scope

An architecture comparison needs a credible basis for its inputs and explicit proposed conditions. A choice needs the relevant decider and authority. Actual performance needs its real occurrence and result. Capability needs evidence for the named holder under its support conditions. A causal-use result is consumed only within its verdict boundary. A possible-future decision establishes no obtaining ArchitectureRelation.

When continuing development is promised, keep the return from an achieved result to a further worthwhile question or justified continuation. When human mastery is promised, examine the human’s contribution. When cultural continuation is claimed, examine transmission and further use at the stated scale. These assurance questions apply to their respective claims, not automatically to every technical support arrangement.