Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:35:13 UTC
C.32.P2S:12 - Relations
Builds on:A.1 and A.1.SCR for an existing system boundary, A.15.6 for project system-of-interest designation and intended-system separation, A.1.STM when the missing outside-to-inside dependency must be located, C.22.2 for problem-side recovery, C.30, C.30.AD, and C.30.ASV for grounded architecture, architecture-description adequacy, and structural-view adequacy, C.33 and C.34 for structural-information capture and preservation, C.35 to recover the kind of a generated or discovered result and assess its adequacy for the next architecture use inside the flow, C.32 for candidate architecture synthesis, C.32.HCS, C.32.ACS, and C.32.ACE for characteristic starter heads, project criteria rows, and eval programs, C.25 for Q-bundles, C.31 family patterns for modularity, reusable structure, and scale preference, C.29 for mathematical-lens use when claimed, E.17 for a source-backed publication face and source return, and E.24.PUB for the publication occurrence and audience availability.
Uses:A.22.CGUS for the P2S unfolding-structure block when problem pressure, structure uncertainty, candidate synthesis, decision linkage, work linkage, and actual-structure feedback must remain inspectable as one constraint-governed unfolding structure; E.18.3, C.30.TFS-REL, E.18, and A.3.4 when architecture pressure concerns transformation-flow or bounded change; C.30.ILC, C.32.MLAO, and B.2 family patterns when cross-scope, interlevel, interlayer, meta-holon, emergence, or reidentification pressure changes the candidate frame; C.32.CONWAY when co-synthesis of exact influence-source and transformed-side architecture content is current; C.32.FAIL when a recognizable architecture-synthesis failure becomes a repair action.
Patterns for the next questions:A.19.CPM, A.19.SelectorMechanism, C.18, C.19, G.5, and C.11 for comparison, selection, archive, front, pool policy, selected-set result declaration, and local choice; C.32.PAD, C.32.ADR, and C.32.ADA for project architecture decision, ADR-like projection, and decision adequacy; C.30.AD for architecture descriptions; A.6.3.NAR for architecture-mediated narrative renderings; E.17 for source-backed publication faces and source return; E.24.PUB for publication occurrences and audience availability; A.3.1 for Method identity and A.3.2 for MethodDescription membership; A.15, A.15.1, A.15.2, and A.15.5 for method-work alignment, performed work, work plan, and readiness; A.3.4 for each actual bounded change; the pattern for the predicate, or A.6.RCD, for Work-to-change claims and blockers; A.15.PROD for separate local production-work, entity-identity-inception, and production-completion claims; C.16, C.25, C.29, C.32.ACE, E.23, G.11, and E.18 for measurement, Q-bundle, mathematical lens, eval, improvement, currentness refresh, and transformation-flow slice-local refresh.
Boundary: Use C.32.P2S for the connected project-local architecturing transformation flow from architecture-relevant pressure to subject-side actual structures recovered under A.22 from obtaining facts, and then to feedback. C.33, C.34, and C.35 deepen the structural-information slot group already present in P2S; they do not move the whole connected flow out of P2S. C.32.P2S does not define or test architecture claims, architecture descriptions, structural views, candidate palettes, comparison, selected-set result declarations, decisions, ADR-like publications, publication forms, publication-use claims, methods, Work, measurement, eval, evidence, assurance, gate, release, improvement, currentness refresh, or formal structural-information theory.