C.32.P2S:6 - Bias-Annotation
Use these rows as repair cues for problem pressure, source-practice transfer, or observed signals, not as a catalogue of mistakes.
| Pressure cue or source-practice row | Risk in P2S use | Repair |
|---|---|---|
| Description-first pressure cue | A view, model, diagram, ADR-like record, dashboard, or memo starts to carry architecture, decision, and work authority at once. | Recover selected structures and current use. Use C.30.AD or C.30.ASV for description adequacy, C.32.PAD for decisions, C.32.ADR for projections, and A.15-family patterns for work claims. |
| Single-winner pressure cue | A score, workshop favorite, generated candidate, or apparent best alternative hides structurally different candidates. | Restore candidate plurality through C.32; keep archive, front, pool, selected-set, comparison, local-choice, or decision use with its applicable pattern. |
| Eval-shaped practice row or signal | A metric, benchmark, source-practice fitness-function term, eval result, or telemetry event is treated as the characteristic or the decision. | Recover characteristic, bearer, scale, eval program, measurement, and receiving use. Use C.32.ACE, C.16, C.25, and then the applicable comparison, selected-set, local-choice, or decision pattern. |
| Architecture-influence basis hidden | Desired transformed-side architecture content is stated without asking which typed Work, communication, tool, method, deployment, evidence, selected-structure, or architecture-side source constrains it. | Open C.32.CONWAY; keep the changed referent and any actual transformation separate, recover both exact C.30 architecture sides or their modal claims, name every influence source by kind and either its exact obtaining direct relation or precise provisional disposition, and prepare influence-source-side, transformed-side, joint, and bounded-mismatch candidates. |
| Work-shaped pressure cue | A schedule, task list, method recipe, performed-work record, shared assembly occurrence, or completion label is treated as the architecturing flow, an actual transformation, a composite transformation, or proof that selected structure is actual. | Keep the A.15-family distinctions intact. The P2S card may cite Work occurrences, independently grounded changes, Work-to-change relations and their rules, separate local A.15.PROD claims, and actual-structure facts only when they obtain; common work or chronology supplies none of the stronger claims. |