C.35:2 - Problem

Modern architecture work receives claim-bearing outputs, representations, publication items, and other results from DSM clusters, MDM slices, MBSE queries, generated views, graph grammars, model transformations, LLM architecture proposals, AI-assisted ADD, code-agent relation graphs, NAS graphs, DSE traces, Pareto fronts, QD archives, benchmark traces, simulations, and source-corpus mining.

These results can expose candidate decompositions, relation gaps, hidden invariants, feasible search regions, trade-off points, source labels, or overlooked organization. They are not automatically obtaining A.22 structures, realized holon structures, eval results, evidence sufficiency, or decision authority.

C.35 handles the gap between exact result identity and architecture use. It first asks what the result is; which claim, represented object, or proposed organization it carries; whether representation or publication distinctions matter; and which architecture use is proposed. It then asks only the questions belonging to the actual branch. A transformation names its exact source and result objects, trace, preservation, and loss. A discovery names its observation or extraction basis, what is observed, inferred, or unknown, the covered and unexplored region, uncertainty, and validation. A generative proposal names its constraints, proposed organization or claim content, known omissions, and validation needs; source and preservation enter only when an actual baseline is declared. Method, performed Work, attribution, bearer feasibility, and publication detail enter only when the receiving use relies on them.