C.37:11 - SoTA-Echoing (informative)
| Source line and status | Adopted move | Rejected overread |
|---|---|---|
| Dutilh Novaes, Formal Languages in Logic (2012), and Krämer, “Why notational iconicity is a form of operational iconicity” (2017), conceptual and diagrammatic-reasoning lineage already used by C.2.1 | Representation and notation can change what users can inspect, compare, calculate, or infer; each row therefore states exposure, loss, and bounded use. | Reasoning affordance does not identify the represented subject, make a direct relation obtain, or authorize the receiving action. |
| W3C PROV-O Recommendation, 2013, stable provenance lineage used by A.10 and C.2.1 | Preserve exact source, entity, activity, and derivation distinctions when they are material to bounded reliance. | Provenance alone is not truth, currentness, permission, assurance, decision, or evidence of actual use. |
| Decision Theory, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, stable baseline used by C.11 | Fix the chooser, option or action question, comparison basis, and explicit receiving result rather than ending with an informed-looking inventory. | C.37 does not replace C.11 or turn every representation-selection question into one universal decision calculus. |
Reopen this source use when newer representation, provenance, view, or decision practice supplies a lower-effort way to keep the same direct-result and receiving-action boundaries, or when real interoperability requires a common standalone account kind that cannot preserve them through ordinary C.2.1 identity and direct references.