C.37:5.1 - Qualified premises for a bounded-trial decision
MethodEngineer-ME1 must select or decline MethodChange-MC7 as the proposed Method edition for one bounded trial in planned Work item WP4. This one decision is the receiving use for all three rows.
In this constructed case, the options are to prepare and run the MC7 trial or retain the current Method edition. WP4 provides a one-hour trial slot. The stipulated setup estimate for MC7 is four additional hours, while the applicable total setup-and-trial ceiling is three hours. Retaining the current edition is feasible within that ceiling. These case facts are additional planning inputs; WorkRecord-W19 does not establish the setup estimate or predict the benefit of MC7.
C.11 result CR7 is choose now: ME1 selects retaining the current edition and declines MC7 for this WP4 use because 4 + 1 hours exceeds the three-hour ceiling. The selected comparison criterion is compliance with that current total budget; the earlier rework record supplies motivation, not permission to exceed it. Reopen CR7 if the setup estimate, budget, options or trial conditions materially change. The decision makes no claim that the planned trial occurred.
| Candidate | Direct result, reliance, and receiving result | Exposed and withheld | Disposition and return |
|---|---|---|---|
Workflow diagram in MethodDescription-MD5, edition 5 | A.3.2 identifies the episteme as a MethodDescription about Method-M2. A.2.4 may classify its intended evidence use. A.10 path P-MD5 carries the premise “edition 5 states the proposed MC7 action order,” its source/currentness window, direct decision-use relation, and RelianceDisposition=pass. Receiving result: CR7, defined above. | Exposes proposed sequence and handoff; withholds actual effort, achieved result, and future performer availability. | select for proposed-way claims only; return if the edition, intended Method, path, or reliance window changes. |
WorkPlan-WP4 trial item | A.15.2 identifies the schedule-of-intent episteme and its planned performer, interval, and capability conditions. A.2.4 may classify the intended use. A.10 path P-WP4 carries the premise “WP4 currently provides the named trial slot and conditions,” source/currentness, direct decision-use relation, and RelianceDisposition=pass. Receiving result: CR7, defined above. | Exposes a bounded trial slot and intended conditions; withholds actual occurrence, performance, and result. | select for the stated trial-slot availability and intended conditions only; return if the plan, performer, interval, capability condition, path, or disposition changes. |
WorkRecord-W19 about actual Work-W19 | A.15.1 admits the dated Work independently; C.2.1 identifies the record episteme. A.2.4 may classify its intended use. A.10 path P-W19 carries the premise “WorkRecord-W19 reports the stated rework and effort under the named earlier conditions,” its provenance and decision-use relation, and RelianceDisposition=degrade to that comparability-limited premise. Receiving result: CR7, defined above. | Exposes observed breakdown and effort under the earlier edition and conditions; withholds proof that MC7 fixes the breakdown or that the trial planned in WP4 will reproduce those observations. | select only for the narrowed comparability-qualified premise; return if the observed conditions, path, currentness, disposition, or relevance to MC7 changes. |
The completed account retains two pass premises and the comparability-limited degrade premise as inputs to CR7. Declining MC7 for WP4 does not make those representations unusable as decision premises; it states the result obtained using them and the additional budget facts. None of the three rows proves that MC7 improves the Method. If the same diagram is later used for a tailoring choice or WorkRecord-W19 for a learning decision, start another account.