C.38:4.2 - Use a proportional parity view
There is no universal arrangement schema. For the current decision, a small table or a few parallel paragraphs are enough if another reader can answer these questions for every way:
| Current decision question | What to make visible |
|---|---|
| Same result | What exact result becomes available, to whom, under which acceptance condition? |
| How it could happen | Which proposed or available Agents, Work, Methods, Systems, values, and direct relations matter? |
| Fit and joining | Which interfaces, configuration, integration, and enabling branches can reverse the choice? |
| Reliance | Which evidence, uncertainty, assurance, authority, and protected conditions matter? |
| Continuation | Which support, maintenance, change, custody, recovery, and exit conditions remain? |
| Consequences | Which resources, capabilities, opportunity costs, and affected Systems change? |
| Premise status | What is supported now, merely proposed, or still unknown? |
Delete a row that changes no candidate comparison. Add a local question when omitting it could reverse the choice. A candidate is complete enough when its important means, dependencies, burdens, and gaps are visible to this decision—not when it fills a universal checklist.