C.38:8 - Anti-patterns

• Labels as option kinds. Build, buy, provider, internal, reuse, or AI are compared as peers without resolving their contents.
• Different results in one table. One row supplies a System, another a service, another a capability, and another an episteme, while all are scored as if equivalent.
• Universal arrangement schema. A local parity view becomes a mandatory ontology, graph, taxonomy, or workflow for every domain.
• Modal-to-actual leap. A possible-future row is treated as capability, authority, Work, provision, purchase, delivery, acceptance, or availability.
• Score before parity. Numbers conceal different assumptions, missing burdens, or protected conditions.
• Endless generation. Open-ended candidate invention is kept inside C.38. Use C.39 for a missing obtaining explanation or C.40 for feasible variation and examination; add C.18 for archive/front claims and C.19 for live-pool policy only when those contributions are needed.
• Choice by formatting. The most detailed or first row is treated as selected before C.11.
• Domain takeover. The common Method absorbs architecture, procurement, contracting, finance, legal, artistic, operational, or assurance decisions.
• Duplicate account. A domain Method already returns the full comparison, but a second generic episteme is added anyway.