C.40:7 - Conformance Checklist

Usable material and a feasible changing operation are available, or the missing prerequisite remains explicit.
A performed variation, its examined difference and a proposed later use are distinguishable.
Fixed-contribution and unsettled-contribution uses do not require one another.
Retained material and conditions make the stated continuation possible at a warranted burden.
Coupled use constructs meaningful problems and judges transfer on the target’s own conditions.
A mixed or failed transfer changes the next problem or way question as its evidence permits.
A sufficient existing way, adequate result or unwarranted continuation supplies a usable stop.
Archive, front, selection, capability and permission claims keep their separate meanings.
When the candidate is an obtaining way, the comparison identifies its actual application and produced result, any approximation or inherited state, and the conditions of the receiving-use claim.
When learning changes the histories later encountered, targets correspond to those reached histories and the learner’s available inputs; missing teaching or information has an explicit return.
For persistence or recovery, continuation states are realizable and compatible with the rule; original-start ability and functioning after recovery receive the trials required by their claims.
Adaptive operation choice supplies execution after selection, an actual result-update rule and the continuation conditions of its comparison.
Comparing future development returns a joint account of difference, quality and admissibility to the starting material or mapping; its trial supports only the continuation actually performed.
Repeated contraction specifies survival, feasible regrowth and the next event, with loss and total work included in comparison.
For model-assisted policy search, action realization, model predictions, actual outcomes and translated expert behavior have separate grounds; the returned policy retains the observations and conditions it needs.
For comparison-guided development, the pair evidence, learned prediction, derived order and actual receiving result retain their different grounds; missing pairs and changed conditions lead to an explicit next inquiry or bounded stop.
When a human contribution changes development, its input reaches an executable variation, learning signal, examination or branch choice; the resulting behavior is checked at its receiving use. Rule readability, copying fidelity, human approval and actual outcome remain distinct.