Jump to text
On this page
Copy and source
Original source · lines 39–47
Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-23 07:41:16 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-23 07:43:19 UTC · last check 2026-10-23 10:55:10 UTC

B. Design a planning-and-feedback architecture

§ID & TitleStatusKeywords & Search QueriesDependencies
B.1CAD.1 - Derive a Control Decomposition from the Whole ProblemStableControl decomposition; information; horizon; computational burden. “Should these decisions be separated?”Uses C.39 and MMP.9; CAD.2 develops the selected exchange; CAD.4 compares whole candidates.
B.2CAD.2 - Construct the Planning and Feedback InterfaceStableReference meaning; state reconstruction; sample-and-hold; reset; tracking dynamics. “What does the lower loop actually receive?”Uses the selected decomposition and MMP.18; CAD.5:4.7 supplies the estimate-based branch.
B.3CAD.3 - Construct a Jointly Admissible Command DomainStableInvariant error; input reserve; constraint tightening; continuation. “Which commands can remain feasible?”Uses CAD.2’s connected dynamics; CAD.5:4.7 when state is estimated; returns to CAD.1 or CAD.2 on incompatibility.
B.4CAD.4 - Co-design and Realize the Whole Control ArchitectureStableModel order; gains; rates; deadlines; whole-candidate comparison. “Which feasible arrangement should be realized?”Receives applicable CAD.1–CAD.3 and CAD.5 results; uses MMP.22; supplies the broader SYSE.6 decision.