Library / Community Building Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:50:20 UTC

CB.13:4.1 - Separate the shared questions and affected parties

Name the intended common result and decisions needed to obtain it. For a joint event, these may concern its programme, common spending and use of a shared name. A local club’s recurring schedule can remain outside that common subject.

Identify whose work, resources, access or accepted commitments each decision would change. Include people who supply upkeep or bear an effect without attending the central meeting. Ask what their participation can change: providing facts, proposing an option, consenting to use of their resource or making the shared choice.

Distinguish a community preference from a separate permission or professional judgement. A group can prefer a venue while its owner determines whether it is available. Members can choose a service aim while a qualified provider determines whether a particular promised performance is supportable. Obtain each result through its actual holder.

Make the smallest useful boundary explicit. State which questions the proposed arrangement can decide, which remain local and which must return elsewhere. If there is no common decision after that separation, use direct agreements or the existing activity owner rather than creating a general governing body.