Library / Community Building Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:35:10 UTC

CB.6:4.2 - Choose what the response should accomplish

Decide whether the present need is to make the contribution’s effect visible, convey appreciation, give fair credit, offer a useful opportunity or change a recurring recognition arrangement. These aims can combine, but each should have an actual recipient and result.

Begin with the least elaborate response that fits. A private message explaining a concrete use may be more valuable than a generic public accolade. Returning a recipient’s permitted account of what changed can give the contributor information that the organiser could not supply alone.

Find out how the person wants to be recognised when the choice matters. They may welcome a named example, prefer collective credit, want an introduction, or decline publicity. Existing preferences and the relationship may be sufficient for a routine thank-you; a new public profile, attribution of sensitive work or substantial opportunity warrants an explicit agreement.

People can contribute because they enjoy the activity, because they value its outcome, because they accept a responsibility or because provision is paid. A fitting response does not require the organiser to declare one motive authentic and the others defective. Ask whether the response respects the person’s choice and helps them understand their contribution.

Keep recognition and an agreement for work clear. Pay or reimburse what was agreed. A gift does not settle an outstanding obligation, and a thank-you does not obtain a new commitment. If continued work needs funding, access or protected time, arrange those conditions through their owners.