CHK.2:5 - Archetypal Grounding

The selected card questions become this reusable template:

Set and comparison description	All described cards present and readable?	Wording matches the described edition?	Set assembled for delivery?
Identify the physical set and the description of its contents	Answer; count/inspection basis; observation time when reused	Answer; comparison basis and observation time	Answer; assembly observation and time

A constructed instance supplies the references and grounds:

Set and comparison description	All described cards present and readable?	Wording matches the described edition?	Set assembled for delivery?
S; twenty cards, wording v2	Yes: twenty present and readable, observed 10:00	Yes: all cards compared with v2, observed 10:05	Yes: assembled, observed 10:10

Suppose the wide table on a small screen separates the answer from its S/v2 reference. Transpose the same information so the recipient can recover both together:

Question for S against the description of twenty cards with wording v2	Answer and basis
All described cards present and readable?	Yes: twenty present and readable, observed 10:00
Wording matches v2?	Yes: all cards compared with v2, observed 10:05
Set assembled for delivery?	Yes: assembled, observed 10:10

If entries are recorded at 10:12, that time describes the recording. It neither changes the observation times nor shows when each condition first became true. A split view for counting and a view for wording comparison retain the S/v2 references and the relevant observation grounds. A detached green square cannot do that.

For an AI-assisted importer, a template can ask for an observed catalogue before and after a malformed input, with a reference to the input and the comparison performed. A field headed “Tests pass” loses the specific question if it is detached from those cases. When an observation tool fails, the form supports “unknown: post-import catalogue was not obtained”; it does not coerce the agent into a positive completion entry.