Library / Checklist Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:55:09 UTC

CHK.2:7 - Conformance Checklist

Inspect an actual filled example, not only the blank template:

  • Can the intended recipient recover the subject, question, comparison basis, answer and sufficient grounds?
  • Can the form represent a negative answer and an unresolved one without conflating them?
  • Is any inapplicability reason about the question’s scope rather than missing evidence?
  • Do shared references and answer meanings survive the actual transpose, split or tool transfer?
  • Does every retained field help the intended use, and is nearby help enough for the expected user?