Relied-on framework content
The Checklist edition relies on the following content for the receiving uses stated here. The direct pattern links identify the supplying text.
| Supplier | Content used and receiving use | Change that reopens reliance |
|---|---|---|
| Current FPF: E.10.D2, A.3.1, A.3.2, A.6.P.RI | Subject/description/use separation, Method/MethodDescription distinction and recovery of participant-relative references in the six Methods. | A changed distinction defeats the interpretation of questions, templates or performed work. |
| Current FPF: A.3.3, A.3.4, A.22 | Transformation and state-structure distinctions in the Preface and change examples. | A changed governing claim alters what a described state or transformation relation means. |
| Current FPF: B.1.5, A.15.10, A.15.11 | Constituent/encompassing Method use, changed premises and noticing applicable Methods in CHK.1, CHK.3–5. | A changed relation alters the local-to-whole inference, recovery or support arrangement. |
| Current FPF: A.19.ULSAM | Admitted measures and lawful aggregation when CHK.6 examines a numerical total. | Changed measures, inclusion or aggregation meaning defeat the numerical inference. Separate answers need no aggregate. |
| Method Engineering: ME.3, ME.8, ME.10, ME.11, ME.14, ME.16 | Criterion construction, Method description, enactment arrangement, representative trial, worth and improvement. | A changed supplier result makes the corresponding Checklist action or return unsound. ME.3’s generic requirement wording is not imported as deontic force. |
| Operations Management: OPS.3, OPS.4, OPS.6, OPS.18 | Operating-subject distinctions, shared operating state, case continuation and quality/reliability control used in CHK.3–5. | Changed work or record semantics defeats combined use or recovery. |
| Organization Administration: ADM.7, ADM.13 | Claim-checking and fit-for-use record distinctions, adapted from administrative practice in CHK.4–6. Administrative authority or institutional rules apply only where independently relevant. | A changed checking or coordination relation alters the supplied result. |
| Human Capability Development: HCD.3; Organization Change Engineering: OCE.6, OCE.10 | Capability analysis and organizational introduction when CHK.3 reveals those needs. | The identified capability or introduction arrangement no longer serves the intended work. |
| Explanation Design: EXD.1, EXD.6 | Recovering the explanatory question and comparing repairs to checklist meaning. | Recipients cannot recover a consequential distinction through the supplied explanation. |
| The particular work domain | Descriptions, usefulness assumptions, competent judgements and observations; separately applicable legislative requirements where relevant. | Changed domain evidence, purpose, subject or applicable law changes the criterion or receiving action. |
This edition uses the supplying text identified in its first-edition source basis. A later date or a working hyperlink does not establish semantic compatibility. Before reusing an answer affected by a supplier change, compare the actual changed content with its named receiving use. Unaffected Methods remain usable.