D.3:1.1 - Forces · fpf.tools

Force	Tension
Conflict description vs. decision use	The sides and their tension must be inspectable before D.4 can mediate, refuse, or support a bounded decision.
Level and scope plurality vs. fixed ladder	A case may involve persons, teams, organizations, communities, systems, epistemes, or environments without one universal hierarchy.
Conflict vs. description	A narrative, table, graph, or formal expression can describe the conflict but is not the situation, claims, harms, or relations it describes.
Cheap first result vs. reusable precision	Most cases first need two clear sides and one tension statement; later reuse may need an identified episteme and typed supporting relations.
Agency evidence vs. responsibility	Evidence may support an agency characteristic or threshold. Responsibility still needs its own direct predicate and actual participants; no score, label, collection name, or assignment supplies it.
Architecture residual vs. ethical conflict	A cross-scope structure can be architectural, ethical, or both. `C.30.ILC` triages the architecture residual; D.3 describes the ethical conflict.