Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:30:19 UTC

D.3:2.3 - Add detail only when it changes the conflict or its next use

Open this branch when…Add…Keep separate…
A Method is part of a side’s claim.the exact U.Method under A.3.1 and, when cited, its MethodDescription under A.3.2Method identity from any dated performance
Performance actually occurred.use A.13 to identify the actual performer System; use A.15.1 to admit the exact dated U.Work independently from its history, Method, extent, and containing System; if the conflict account must also identify the assignment under which the Work was performed, check that relation separately through F.6keep a plan, intention, assignment, capability, permission, authority, and responsibility separate from performed Work
Assignment matters.the exact assignment species and its obtaining occurrence under A.2.1, with actual participants and applicabilityassignment from performance, responsibility, permission, or authority
Role-shaped wording or classification matters.one E.10.ROLE recovery, then the local kind and a separate C.2.1 classification assertion episteme under C.3.2 after the candidate passes its admissibility testthe word role, kind, assertion, assignment, and acting System from one another
Evidence changes a side or its uncertainty.the evidence episteme and the exact A.10 evidence-use or reliance resultstored evidence from reliance on it
A transformation changes who benefits or is harmed.the exact transformation occurrence under A.3.4 and its affected participantsa transformation description from the occurrence
Membership or part-whole structure matters.the exact collection-membership or part-whole predicate and obtaining occurrencea plural name from an acting or responsible System
Agency is disputed.the exact Characteristic, Scale, threshold, and supporting evidence usean agency reading from responsibility
Responsibility, permission, authority, commitment, or participation is claimed.the exact relation definition and obtaining occurrence, or the exact A.6.RCD missing-governor resultthe relation family from an occurrence; the occurrence from evidence for it
A calculation or formal comparison changes the tension.the exact C.29 representation, its correspondence to the independently recovered objects, and the operation useda formula or score from the ethical conflict or decision
Publication or audience use changes the ethical claim.the selected episteme edition, publication occurrence, form, carrier, audience, and bounded use under E.17 and E.24.PUBthe published episteme from its form, carrier, publishing Work, and availability relation
A harm or benefit depends on causality, assurance, or architecture.only the affected C.28, B.3, D.5, or C.30.ILC returnthe conflict description from causal proof, assurance, or architecture selection

Open no branch merely because the field exists. The detail must change a side, the tension, or the next receiving use.