D.5:1.1 - Forces · fpf.tools

Force	Tension
Ordinary verification vs. subgroup harm	Evidence or accuracy can look strong while representation, proxy, metric, visibility, language, or impact bias remains current.
Bounded answer vs. stronger reliance	A current concern may need only a qualified answer; a release or assurance claim can need a fuller account of the basis, mitigations, and residuals it relies on.
Fairness wording vs. causal claim	Metric disparity, associative fairness, interventional fairness, and counterfactual fairness are different claims.
Assurance relation vs. ethical permission	Assurance can record examined evidence and residuals, but cannot turn unresolved bias or harm into moral authorization.
Audit frame vs. neighboring owners	D.5 must keep bias and ethical assurance visible without replacing evidence, causality, measurement, architecture, or D.1 through D.4.