fpf.tools
Library / Development Opportunity Construction and Development-Direction Advising Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 387–403

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:00:10 UTC

DOCA.1:7 - Conformance Checklist

A conforming use or companion account:

  1. MUST name the exact subject or provisional subject boundary and claim posture.
  2. MUST state the receiving use and receiver when known. Otherwise, identify the local question being investigated and keep the future receiving use open.
  3. MUST declare the horizon set or decision window that can change the result.
  4. MUST expose protected conditions before candidate selection.
  5. MUST distinguish qualified grounds, explicit hypotheses, supplier promises, and search leads.
  6. MUST state a proportional inquiry budget and any permission needed for the inquiry itself.
  7. MUST identify the first missing result, its direct owner or next pattern, and the smallest useful return.
  8. MUST NOT present the inquiry as a recommendation, choice, programme, Guide, performed Work, observed effect, or intervention authority.
  9. MUST preserve independent Construction and Advising entry; no PatternID order may be presented as a mandatory lifecycle.
  10. MUST state a stop or local reopen condition.
  11. SHOULD use ordinary prose before any compact form.
  12. MUST return a specific gap or non-use case when the subject or a condition needed for the proposed inquiry cannot be established.