fpf.tools
Library / Development Opportunity Construction and Development-Direction Advising Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 866–871

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:05:20 UTC

DOCA.2:5.2 - A person searches contributions, not course names

Mira has four months to explore a next contribution in engineering Work. She contrasts evidence review, where the receiver needs unsupported claim-to-test links found, with interface coordination, where specialists need incompatible assumptions surfaced. Reading technical documents occurs in both; their receiving results differ.

She also varies support. For evidence review, permitted examples exist but representative capability and transfer evidence are missing. For coordination, access to participants and competent feedback are not established. The two leads retain different missing premises. Either conditional lead can finish this inquiry; request further evidence only when its obtainable contribution warrants acquisition through A.15.9 and C.11.DUA. A course catalogue may suggest a resource, but cannot merge the contributions or fill either gap. Mira can stop with these questions without engaging an adviser.