DOCA.3:4.5 - Link the contribution to the problem without assuming success

Explain why the proposed result could address the missing receiving result. Mark that connection as supported, conditional, disputed, or hypothetical according to its evidence. Identify what a plausible contrary answer would change.

Ask the smallest question that distinguishes the live possibilities. “Does the reviewer need a source-traceable account of unsupported claims, or is the delay actually caused by unavailable acceptance authority?” can redirect the contribution. “Would you like better AI?” cannot distinguish the problem from the preferred solution.

Use existing adequate results before requesting new Work. When another practice must supply an answer, use A.15.9 for the bounded result request and reliance boundary. The supplying practice answers its own substantive question. A proposed interview, measurement, or experiment still needs the permissions and conditions applicable to that activity.