DOCA.5:5.3 - Data access does not complete an AI reachability claim

In this constructed case, a team has a model benchmark result and permission to inspect a small data sample. Its proposed direction is a retrieval-assisted review arrangement using a different configuration and representative operational data.

The benchmark does not establish the receiving configuration’s performance. Sample inspection does not establish permission for operational processing, continuing data access, evaluation coverage, or adequate human oversight. Use the AI, data-governance, and operating practices’ specific results through A.15.9. Until the required transfer and support results exist, retain the arrangement as conditional.

If the qualified data result excludes that operational use, reject the access-dependent route for that use. Preserve a permitted manual route when its evidence is independent. A population or lineage can likewise be the subject of a scientist’s reachability hypothesis, but it is not thereby an advice recipient or authorized chooser; a proposed intervention remains the scientist’s or organization’s separately governed case.