Library / Development Opportunity Construction and Development-Direction Advising Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:40:05 UTC

DOCA.6:5.3 - Mira retains directions before choosing a programme

In this constructed case, Mira is exploring review contributions over four months. She keeps two directions: develop more independent review capability, or improve the conditions for supported contribution. The first needs HCD evidence about representative practice, feedback, and transfer; the second needs an actual continuing support arrangement. Both can remain described while those questions are open.

A preliminary exercise is only a candidate stepping stone toward independent review until its enabling relation and feasible development conditions are supported. Being the first item in a course sequence is not that evidence. Retaining its description does not reserve Mira’s practice time or a specialist’s attention.

When direction advice is requested, the bounded engagement and PSD results remain separate from the authorized direction choice. HCD.2 then composes and compares human capability-development programmes when that is the selected question. An optional PSD programme recommendation, authorized programme choice, and Learning Product Guide remain further distinct results. If an adequate programme comparison already exists, the programme-level question can begin there; Mira need not reconstruct an opportunity portfolio to use it.