fpf.tools
Library / Development Opportunity Construction and Development-Direction Advising Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 2361–2372

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:10:10 UTC

Finite directions and a conditional later step

Call Mira’s actual checklist-and-reference arrangement S0. Direction A adds supported practice of that contribution and later task checks; direction B changes the review-service arrangement. They are compared against the same S0, task family, horizon and protections. DOCA.5 asks HCD for the person-specific challenge, support, practice and transfer basis, and the service owner for real review capacity. Separately plausible components do not establish joint availability.

Finite candidateReceiving result and complete burden questionTransition, reversibility, and optionsPresent conclusion
A: S0 plus supported practice, producing prospective S1HCD must qualify expected task closure and transfer; count preparation, attempts, feedback, retries, checks, mentor work, displacement and total weekly burden. Preserve the critical-error and disclosure constraints.Setup and later checking remain prospective costs. Identify the cost of stopping the segment and restoring displaced work before claiming reversibility. Later unfamiliar-case practice is an option only if its prerequisite is qualified.Conditional direction, not a qualified improvement or programme.
B: S0 plus a proposed review-service contributionThe service practice must qualify output, response time, capacity, continuing cost, Mira’s coordination burden and effects on other supported teams. The same protected errors and disclosure limits apply.Establish actual provider availability and withdrawal consequences; retained external support is not unaided personal performance.Conditional support-direction alternative; do not relabel it personal development.
Later unfamiliar-case practice after AFor a planned step, use the stated prospective S1 and keep its result conditional. For an actual transition, use the S1 actually obtained and reconsider any difference. Qualify the new task, support, time and transfer evidence from that starting configuration.Keep the first step’s incurred costs in history if it occurred. Compare the next increment separately; do not credit the first gain twice or charge hypothetical setup as spent.Candidate enabling relation; HCD evidence must support the prerequisite and transfer claim.

C.11.CRC governs any stronger finite comparison. The result, resource, affected-person/team, distributional and protected coordinates above must be complete on one qualified basis, including interactions and evidence limits. No Pareto or aggregate-savings claim follows from these descriptions. DOCA.6 may retain A, B and the conditional later step with their missing-result and reconsideration conditions.