Guide realization, performed attempts, and evidence

Only after the programme choice does Learning Product practice realize its instructional part as a Guide. LG.02 places the first distinction, worked use and later varied return at stable addresses. LG.05 develops the focal contribution into recognition, explanation, move, result/check, worked case, contrast and practice. LG.03 tests the learner’s next action rather than the fragment’s apparent polish.

A unit can show a completed bounded request and why one existing report is reusable. Its practice case changes the receiving configuration; Mira must decide whether to reuse, narrow or request, produce the stated result, and check the same conditions. The unfamiliar case must require a fresh applicability decision, not recall of the identifier. These are instructional design contributions; the Guide is not the programme, performed practice, or proof that learning occurred.

In a later constructed observation, Mira completes the scheduled attempts and the assessor qualifies all five familiar tasks with the allowed reference, but one unfamiliar configuration still leads to an unsupported transfer. The observation supports the familiar-task result only under its measured conditions. HCD retains diagnosis, transfer and later evidence. DOCA.8 reopens the stronger unfamiliar-work claim and any dependent path; PSD.14 receives affected advice. Completing those activities and succeeding on the familiar tasks do not prove general transfer or reduced cognitive load.

The result-use sequence in this branch is:

HCD evidence → DOCA opportunity/path candidates → PSD direction advice when requested → authorized direction choice → HCD.2 programme comparison → PSD programme advice when requested → authorized programme choice → Learning Product Guide → performed attempts → HCD and representative-Work evidence → affected reconsideration.

These are distinct results, not mandatory stages. The inquiry may stop much earlier.