Link to current text
E.10.D2:12 - Consequences
| Consequence | Cost or boundary |
| Description and specification wording becomes safer across FPF. | Authors must recover one C.2.1 constitution and the receiving use instead of relying on a suffix, title, or filled context record. |
| One episteme can remain stable across changed viewpoint selections, harnesses, evidence, publications, carriers, and representations. | Each changed neighboring use needs its own subject pattern when it matters to the next action. |
| Publication, evidence, assurance, gate, work, state, and system-role-kind or assignment claims remain independently testable. | Prose can become slightly longer when a source phrase compressed several non-substitutable relations. |
| The ordinary move stays small because optional neighbors are opened conditionally. | A genuinely load-bearing neighbor cannot be hidden merely to keep the sentence short. |
| A local application can return an exact blocker. | Reopen when the receiving use, C.2.1 discriminator, required direct governor, or checkability basis cannot be recovered from current facts. |