Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:00:05 UTC

E.10.D2:17 - Conformance checklist

IDCheck
CC-D2-1Is the exact receiving use and its next question or action named before optional qualification machinery is opened?
CC-D2-2Does every description episteme recover the exact C.2.1 ClaimGraph, EntityOfConcern, and effective ReferenceScheme, without a local slot relation or record-shaped constitution?
CC-D2-3Are the EntityOfConcern and claim-bearing episteme independently recoverable under C.2.1, with different triples kept distinct and the permitted self-description case preserved?
CC-D2-4When one describing use selects a viewpoint, are the use and exact viewpoint named separately from episteme identity, conformance, and U.View membership?
CC-D2-5Does every ...Spec use have checkable claims and an exact harness or validation relation, with any reliance-relevant viewpoint selection preserved or updated for the named describing use?
CC-D2-6Are grounding, view, scope, model-use structure, evidence, assurance, edition, currentness, publication, carrier, and representation opened only when the receiving use depends on their direct relation?
CC-D2-7Are publication occurrence, form, carrier, representation, file, dashboard and work-record uses recovered under their own rules, and is U.View membership a separately established property of the same episteme rather than another identity?
CC-D2-8Is current prose free of peer-layer I-D-S vocabulary, intensional object, DescribedEntity*, EntityOfInterest, EoI, EoIClass, mandatory context recursion, and a local DescriptionContext tuple?
CC-D2-9Is the word plane absent for this distinction, with ReferencePlane reserved for a subject pattern such as CHR that actually defines it?
CC-D2-10Is wording about the “role” of a description, source, standard, requirement, evidence item, publication, dashboard, or view resolved to its exact typed use rather than a spurious U.SystemRoleAssignment?
CC-D2-11Do systems perform work while epistemes carry claims, and are statuses, gate verdicts, permission, acceptance, assurance, and runtime state kept under their subject patterns?
CC-D2-12Does the application stop at the smallest sufficient result or return one exact missing-fact or missing-governor blocker?