fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 89727–89736

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 06:55:20 UTC

E.10.D2:3 - Forces

ForcePressure
Short practitioner move vs recoverable ontologyReaders need a concise first move, while a load-bearing claim must still recover the exact C.2.1 constitution and any live neighboring relation.
Stable episteme identity vs changing usesOne episteme can be viewed, checked, published, represented, or used differently without acquiring another identity.
Checkability vs official appearanceA document can be detailed, approved, or schema-backed without satisfying specification-use conditions.
Useful qualification vs mandatory context recordA receiving use may need viewpoint, scope, model-use, or publication qualification; imposing all of them on every description recreates an omnibus record.
Recursive description vs a meta-ontologyAn episteme can itself be described, but that case should use ordinary C.2.1 recursion rather than another description layer.