E.10.D2:9 - Archetypal grounding and bias annotation

System case. A service-interface description carries claims about one exact system interface under its effective scheme. The interface is the EntityOfConcern. A selected viewpoint for a safety review, a conformance harness, a publication to operators, and a deployment gate are four separate uses; none belongs in episteme identity.

Episteme case. A DRR, pattern, safety case, source set, or model episteme can itself be the EntityOfConcern of another episteme. A review note about it uses ordinary C.2.1 recursion. Its dashboard, PDF, publication, evidence path, and review work remain separate regardless of which one the reader first encounters.

Card and diagram case. A filled card or diagram can be a claim-bearing episteme when its C.2.1 constitution is recoverable. Its layout can separately be a publication form or representation, and its file can be a carrier. Filling or displaying it makes no subject relation obtain.

The dominant bias is substitution by the most visible object: a reader sees a file, diagram, dashboard, card, label, or status and lets it replace the independently governed entity, episteme, relation occurrence, or authority needed for the decision. The corrective move is not lexical replacement. Recover the exact object and direct relation for the named receiving use.