E.10.INT:4.3 - Combine contributions in a development project

A project can use information-seeking to distinguish alternatives, learning progress to choose a promising practice opportunity, and novelty or diversity to retain further possibilities. State the contribution of each rule to that project.

For example, a group can test the controller in §5.1 during a maintenance window. The researcher calls input 1 interesting because its response distinguishes two candidate relations. A colleague sees the query construction as material for other unknown interfaces. The maintenance team needs the controller returned to service before the window ends. Recover their claims as three instructions: “Query input 1 to choose the command”; “Keep this construction available for exploration of other interfaces”; and “Schedule controller work within the available window.” If the relation is supplied, the query becomes unnecessary. The potential use of the construction remains, and the window still constrains any remaining controller work.

C.11 compares formed options when a choice is needed. C.19 helps decide which directions in an active search pool to continue, retain or stop. A single agent’s information-seeking policy uses the applicable subject method; choosing among formed queries can use C.11. C.40 supports the development of problems and ways. The field’s methods supply the experiment, training activity or construction itself.