Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 17:24:51 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 17:30:20 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 19:00:10 UTC

E.10.LRN:11 - SoTA Echoing

Source lineAdopted distinctionLimit retained here
OECD, Teaching Compass, 2025Keep teaching agency and practice distinct from student competency development.The framework does not define FPF kinds or prove capability from teaching occurrence.
ISO/IEC 22989:2022 terminology as reused by ISO/IEC TS 42119-2:2025Treat ML as computational optimization of model parameters and keep the resulting model and testing distinct.Source-local terminology does not settle human learning, deployment capability, or generalization evidence.
Goodfellow et al., Generative Adversarial Nets, 2014Separate minimax training Work, trained models, and generated samples.Historical anchor; it does not establish every current GAN evaluation or deployment claim.
de Boer et al., Guiding Curiosity, 2026Preserve the current empirical contrast between performance-based and information-based uses of “learning progress.”Shared source wording does not make capability change and information gain the same FPF result.
Tajwar et al., Training a Generally Curious Agent, 2025Keep trained information-gathering capability, interaction data, environment feedback, and transfer conditions explicit.One agent-training line does not supply a universal curiosity or learning objective.
Papert and Harel, Situating Constructionism, 1991, and Kafai et al., Designing Constructionist Futures, 2020Treat public/shareable construction as a Method and evidence-design commitment, not a synonym for incremental constructivism.Artifact existence does not prove authorship, capability, transfer, or retention.
Segovia-Martin et al., cultural-evolution review, 2024Keep copying and reconstructive transmission alternatives and the unit-of-transmission question open.A pattern can be one named cultural variant without becoming a universal meme or knowledge atom.

Recheck a source line only when a newer edition changes a distinction used by this Solution or when contrary evidence shows that the current branch boundary changes a practitioner action. Recency alone does not merge branches.