E.10.MOVE:4 - Solution

Cheap ordinary use. When the governed value and its direct pattern are already evident, apply F.19, name the value, rewrite the phrase without changing the claim, confirm the remaining admissible reader use, and stop. Do not materialize the repair note or traverse the disposition table. Open the fuller procedure only when the wording remains ambiguous, carries several governed values, imports a source term, or must be replayed later.

For a mantra, recover the pattern use before deciding that two phrases mean different moves. A question about a difficulty can refer to the Problem frame or Problem; a reminder of what to do can refer to the same use through the Solution. “Find what the trial establishes” can state the difficulty and the action intended to resolve it. When the subject, intended result and conditions are clear, retain the useful wording. Clarify a missing participant or relation where the reader would otherwise choose a different pattern or action. This wording choice decides neither whether a mantra is local or long nor whether a surrounding presentation is a demonstrative slice of an independently qualified CGUS.

Restore the governed target before choosing replacement wording:

1. Name the exact GovernedTextSpan, the ClaimBeingMade, and the ObjectUnderWordingRepair.
2. Decide whether the wording is ordinary prose, a quotation, or wording relied on for an FPF-governed claim. Ordinary and quotation uses can close without inventing a technical target.
3. When the phrase is mantra move, first ask which use is present. In a post-qualification A.22.CGUS demonstrative slice that shows pattern use, recover the exact E.11.PUA PatternUsePracticeContinuationDescription@Context: its proposed use, expected result and kind, PatternID and name, current condition, and continuation disposition. Keep mantra move only as bounded Plain wording for that shown continuation. A.22.CGUS supplies the structure and slice boundary; it does not create a universal displayed-row kind. For a Plain local mantra, name the bounded result and restore the move-like wording through that result’s exact predicate or constraint. For a Plain long mantra, name the intended final result and the particular map location whose answer or stop is current, then state the exact answer or blocker and use the subject pattern only as a locator. Do not invent a demonstrated row, collapse the long map into one pattern’s Solution, or treat any branch as Work order.
4. When move, movement, direction, or similar wording predicts a later evaluation result, recover ExpectedEvaluationResultChange@Context under E.23. That value is a coordinate-and-scale-qualified prediction episteme, not an operation, transition, movement, work occurrence, or proof of improvement.
5. For every other governed use, name the exact recovered value or relation, its kind, and its subject pattern. For a relation claim, name the admitted direct predicate and actual participants. Add a RelationSignature reference only when an admitted reusable typed declaration is current and the receiving use needs that declaration. If the governed value is already clear, use its pattern directly.
6. Split the text when one phrase carries more than one governed value. A recommendation, method, transformation, readiness claim or result, gate decision, publication relation, and performed Work do not become one value because the same word was used for them.
7. Preserve RemainingReaderUse: the repair is complete only when a practitioner can still tell what can be inspected, selected, evaluated, planned, performed, or returned to next.

E.10.MOVE:4.1 - MoveAndReadinessWordingRepairNote

MoveAndReadinessWordingRepairNote:
  EncounteredWording:
  GovernedTextSpan:
  ClaimBeingMade:
  ObjectUnderWordingRepair:
  WordingUseDispositionValue: boundedDemonstratedContinuation | evaluationResultChangePrediction | directGovernedUse | importedSourceWording | ordinaryProse | quoteOnly
  SubjectPatternLocator?: PatternID, locating the pattern whose content defines, constrains, or tests the recovered value
  RecoveredGovernedValueRef?: U.EntityRef
  RecoveredGovernedValueKindRef?: U.KindRef
  RecoveredRelationSignatureRef?: U.EntityRef, referencing one RelationSignature
  RetainedPlainWording?:
  BlockedOverread?:
  SplitDisposition?:
  FinalWordingOrBlocker:
  RemainingReaderUse:
  QualificationWindow:
  CurrentnessBasis:
  ReopenCondition:

The governed-value ref and kind ref are both present or both absent. BlockedOverread? states a rejected reading and appears only when independent local evidence makes the exact rival reading plausible to the intended reader and deleting the boundary would change understanding, selection, safety, reliance, stop, or action. The relation-signature ref is present only when an admitted reusable typed declaration is current and the receiving use needs that declaration. Otherwise a relation claim names the admitted direct predicate and actual participants without a signature ref. A governed use has a non-semantic SubjectPatternLocator: an ordinary PatternID that identifies the pattern whose content defines, constrains, or tests the recovered value. Where the receiving claim needs a Method or MethodDescription, use the independent A.3.1 and A.3.2 conditions; admit any Method-use relation under its direct relation owner. For ordinary prose or quote-only use, the disposition explains why no FPF object is claimed; the corresponding object positions may remain absent. The ...Ref fields carry references of the declared RefKinds; they do not carry the referenced values or kinds. A materialized note also states the edition, source, context, or time window in which the repair is relied on, the current pattern or source basis for that interpretation, and the smallest change that reopens it. Use G.11 only when actual refresh orchestration is current; the note merely records its own currentness boundary. FinalWordingOrBlocker gives the wording or blocker for this bounded repair under its qualification and currentness conditions; a later change can reopen it. The note is a temporary wording-restoration aid; substantive results use their direct pattern’s admission rules. Ordinary immediate repair need not materialize the note.

E.10.MOVE:4.2 - Trigger groups

After E.10 selects this pattern, use these cue groups to find the appropriate recovery branch while an action-changing ambiguity remains:

• move, step, action, application, solution, and next action;
• readiness, ready, full kit, work entry, committed, and launch-ready;
• movement, direction, or shift used for an expected evaluation-result change;
• route, workflow, process, path, trajectory, loop, or flow used for an unresolved claim about a path, ordering, or what it represents; use the direct exits below;
• imported source wording such as TameFlow MOVE.

The cue group locates a recovery branch. The recovered claim and its direct owner determine the governed-value kind.

E.10.MOVE:4.2.1 - Readiness exits

Stay in E.10.MOVE only while readiness, ready, full kit, work entry, or a similar cue still hides which governed value is meant. Once that value is recovered, use the direct pattern:

If the direct pattern and value were already clear, bypass this table and use that pattern immediately.

E.10.MOVE:4.2a - No synonym closure

Recover the governed value and its subject pattern before closing a synonym replacement. Ordinary-prose or quote-only use closes when no FPF-governed value is claimed.

If responsibility is the remaining claim, name the admitted System, direct domain predicate, actual participants, and applicability, or return the exact A.6.RCD missing governor; an assignment is not a responsibility result. Individuate the responsibility-relation occurrence separately only when a named receiving use needs to distinguish that occurrence.

E.10.MOVE:4.2b - Trajectory wording recovery

Use this branch when trajectory or close path wording remains claim-bearing after any primary transformation wording has been recovered. The first result is an ordinary repaired claim or exact gap, not a trajectory record.

Ask only the questions the receiving use needs:

1. What exact bearer or represented subject is positioned or ordered?
2. What identity, continuity, membership, lineage, or edition rule matters?
3. Which declared position, state, configuration or possibility space is relied on, if any? Name a defining episteme edition separately when the use depends on it.
4. What is the ordering or reference domain—time, event, generation, plan order, graph order, or another index?
5. What counts as a position, segment, branch, interval, generation, or edge for this use?
6. What posture does the claim need—for example, actual, observed, reconstructed, predicted, simulated, proposed, recommended, or planned?
7. Which direct pattern owns the resulting claim, what receiving use is allowed, and is any grounded non-use boundary needed under the F.19 plausible-intended-reader test?

These are recovery questions, not fields of a new Trajectory, TrajectoryAccount, relation head, Method, or mandatory card.

For development trajectory, open E.10.DEV first when the action-changing doubt is what develops, what remains identifiable, or whether improvement is asserted. Continue here only if trajectory still carries an independent claim about position, ordering, posture, or representation. If the bearer and development claim are already clear and only path posture is unresolved, start here and open E.10.DEV afterward only for a remaining separate ambiguity. Do not require two notes or two full passes by spelling alone.

E.10.MOVE:4.3 - Wording-use dispositions

WordingUseDispositionValue is a local finite enumeration for choosing a repair branch. It is not a U-kind, relation kind, state frame, or claim about the project value being repaired.

E.10.MOVE:4.4 - Relation to A.3.4.P

Use A.3.4.P first when the claim is about a change situation or transformation-flow structure. Use E.10.MOVE only for the remaining wording-use question. If the same sentence also recommends a pattern use, claims readiness, or names a demonstrated continuation, split those claims and use its direct pattern for each.

E.10.MOVE:4.5 - Durable name repair

A durable name states the recovered subject value or relation; it does not retain an implementation head merely because the fields are typed.

These are repair demonstrations, not a global replacement table.