E.10.ROLE:7 - Conformance Checklist

1. Is role being used in a claim, rather than only in ordinary or quoted wording?
2. Does the repaired ordinary sentence name the recognizable object and action or relation?
3. Was the result selected from the recovered claim rather than from the word alone?
4. If a system-role kind is current, are its local boundary and stable contribution distinction recoverable through C.3 and A.2? If a technical classification claim is current, are the candidate’s independent A.1 system admission, exact kind, current KindSignature edition, context slice, and true | false | unknown C.3.2 judgment separately recoverable?
5. If an assignment is current, can you identify both the assignment occurrence and its declared species? Does that species’ direct predicate obtain for the actual participants, including the holder, under the stated applicability, and is the occurrence’s extent recoverable? Is supporting evidence kept separate from whether the assignment obtains?
6. Are participation, declaration slot, operation binding, interface place, and representation position kept distinct?
7. Are functioning, capability, Work, deontics, access, authority, responsibility, evidence use, and results kept under their direct relations?
8. Does ordinary prose stay ordinary when no technical distinction changes the receiving claim?
9. Does the repair add a qualifier only for a live alternative and avoid a fixed formal expansion?
10. For each recovered claim, does the repair stop after one exact object or relation and its applicable rule are selected?