E.10:0.2 - Compact cue and routing surface
Keep these cues available while applying F.19. They help find candidate spans; they do not replace the whole-span judgement.
| Cue family | Inspect in the complete natural span | Continue beyond F.19 only when |
|---|---|---|
Broad or overloaded heads such as support, basis, context, role, process, method, route, record, result, or status | What recognizable object, relation, source, use, or state does the sentence actually mean? | An FPF kind, register, relation, source use, or governed value remains unclear. |
Development- or evolution-family wording such as development, evolution, progress, growth, adaptation, or lineage | What changed or is represented, what continuity or membership matters, what posture or value claim is current, and which direct owner receives it? | Those values remain action-changing and unresolved; use E.10.DEV, then E.10.MOVE only for a separate remaining path or trajectory ambiguity. |
| Agentive or causal predicates attached to evidence, documents, patterns, representations, methods, or other doubtful subjects | Can the grammatical subject bear the asserted predicate under the intended literal or ordinary metonymic reading? Check inside negation, modality, and examples. | Precise systemhood, agency, Work, attribution, evidence, or causal use is itself part of the claim. |
Negative and contrastive forms such as not, rather than, does not mean, does not turn, warnings, and non-use guards | Does a plausible intended reader have an independent local reason to construct the rejected reading, and does the distinction change truth, understanding, or use? | The guard carries an exact FPF admissibility, safety, source-use, or claim boundary. |
Verbs with uncertain objects or destinations; relational nouns such as bearer, boundary, basis, readiness, or condition; vague pronouns and demonstratives | Can one intended operand, other participant, or referent be recovered cheaply and uniquely? | The missing value is an exact FPF participant, relation position, state bearer, or source reference. |
| Grouping marks, repeated coordination at several grammatical levels, comma or semicolon chains, nested lists, stacked modifiers before the governing clause, and coverage heads such as examples, variants, forms, activities, or continuations | Does the reader need a series at all? If so, what proposition it serves, what its membership semantics are, and which members change use? | A closed FPF value set, kind, declaration, relation set, or representation remains unresolved. |
Qualifiers such as exact, direct, current, supported, valid, ready, stronger, or safe | What live alternative, bearer, scale, criterion, time, or bounded use does the qualifier distinguish? | The qualifier carries a governed identity, state, characteristic, decision, or admissible-use claim. |
| New tokens, suffixes, compounds, acronyms, paired registers, and reusable labels | Is this a local wording choice or a durable FPF name, and does its form expose the settled kind? | Register, morphology, token class, collision, or durable naming is current. |
| Source, publication, carrier, field, table, graph, dashboard, or model wording | Is the sentence about the represented object, a claim-bearing episteme, publication or carrier use, or the representation and its correspondence? | The source-use, publication, declaration, or representation boundary is still hidden. |
Semantic-area cues: classify FPF-governed trigger wording before acceptance by semantic area, not by a local forbidden-word list. Typical classes include admissibility/deontic terms, evidence and review-check terms, action-invitation terms, characteristic/scale and stratification source labels, state-family terms, lifecycle/process terms, pattern-application wording, publication-form terms, and local equivalents.
Package-form and relation cues: primary carrier, specialization, profile, overlay, family, bundle, cluster, suite, pack, kit, record, umbrella, and local equivalents.
Item count is only a cue. Two coordinated members may already form a needless catalogue; a long legal set, signature, inventory, or checklist may be required. Matching kinds do not earn a series by themselves: the receiving use must require readers to distinguish or retain the members together.
exact is not a general precision marker. Keep it for literal or bounded source identity, or when it distinguishes a live alternative that changes truth, action, publication, reuse, or reliance. An ordinary PatternID citation needs no formal expansion merely because it is exact.