fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 86996–87006

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:45:10 UTC

E.10:0.2c.24 - basis, context, scope, frame

These words can hide different subject questions; they do not name one common kind.

  • For basis, name the source or direct relation actually used by the sentence—for example, a decision, evidence, comparison, threshold, grounding, or admissibility relation.
  • For context, apply E.10.D1 and recover the subject-defined content that changes the action—for example, a scheme, scope, model-use structure, situation, design-time or run-time referent, architecture, environment, domain subject, or local-practice use.
  • For scope, use A.2.6 when an actual claim scope and its slice-membership facts are current; otherwise use the subject pattern for the stated extent or boundary.
  • For frame, say what the word refers to—for example, a viewpoint, reference frame, comparison frame, state frame, or ordinary narrative framing.

If a basis changes what may be done, state the admissible use. State a relation claim or project-side FPF reference only when the sentence actually makes that claim. If context hides the EntityOfConcern, recover that entity and the subject relation before any Bridge, parity, or identity claim.