E.10:0.2e - Multi-span and corpus use

For a document or corpus, the selected review or editing method defines coverage and manages attention. Search may group likely candidates, but each accepted change comes from reading its natural span and produces repaired text or a blocker; E.10 adds no separate coverage or progress inventory.

Compare recurring FPF-governed heads across the bounded object, especially a selected name, heading, table column, schema field, coordinate name, status value, or reusable authoring term. Also compare a head that carries the local architecture across substantive claims, replaces another broad head, or carries a finding or accepted basis into the final wording. If the repeated head conceals different governed objects or relations, split or rename those uses and reread the affected spans. Ordinary polysemy remains acceptable when each local meaning is clear; repetition alone is not a defect. Check the replacement head as well, so that a new umbrella does not merely preserve the old ambiguity.

If the declared scope is the whole document or corpus, representative examples do not establish coverage. That coverage obligation belongs to the review or campaign that selected the scope; it does not turn E.10 into an inventory format.